▶
Twice the reach,
without paying for it.
Three months of communications for a rural estate marketplace across four channels. Without a single euro of advertising.
reach
published
channels
spend
A catalogue
that became a magazine.
The feed had product but no system: every piece solved its own format. We built a grid — location pill, price always in the same place, editorial covers for the podcast — and the profile became readable at a glance.
The real map
of reach.
Each plot takes up the space its reach earns it. The Facebook group is two thirds of the operation — and it was the channel getting the least attention.
Each plot area is proportional to its reach. YouTube, at 1.0 %, is drawn at a minimum width so the figure stays legible.
A sleeping forum
that woke up.
A group for buying and selling land and rural estates. The community already existed; what was missing was rhythm. From 28 June to 25 August, against the equivalent previous period.
That same day also set the period high for reactions. And it was the day TikTok and Instagram hit their own ceilings. This was not one lucky channel: all three spiked at once.
Three videos
broke the ceiling.
20 videos since June. The account has a stable, predictable floor; what matters is how far the top three clear it. Every bar is measured against that median.
One video,
a third of the reach.
“Los pueblos más bonitos de Cádiz” took almost a third of everything TikTok saw in three months. A single piece, with no paid promotion, against the other nineteen.
median
Los pueblos más bonitos de Cádiz
Less reach,
more people who stay.
Instagram reaches three times less than TikTok and converts four times better. Channel size does not predict channel value. One system serves both pieces: the property card crops from feed to story without losing the grid, and the carousel closes on video.
▶
From 35 minutes
to 27 seconds.
Each episode comes in whole and leaves as vertical pieces with their own title card, subtitles and ending. Choosing which 27 seconds of an hour deserve to exist is half the job. Hover to preview each clip; click to hear it.
▶
▶
Una perdiz vale 10 veces más que un cordero
▶
¿2 meses en una garnaja o 4 en libertad?
▶
Dejamos de cazar 2 años para salvar a la tórtola
And the whole
episode.
Two thirty-five-minute conversations, the source everything else comes from. YouTube reaches twenty-five times less than TikTok and converts fifteen times better: 17.9 views per subscriber, the highest ratio of the four channels.
▶
¿Tiene futuro la caza en España?
▶
¿El boom del outdoor va a cambiar el campo?
Every channel
does one job.
Placed side by side, the four stop competing and divide the work between them. Last 28 days.
| Channel | Share of reach | Conversion to community | Role |
|---|---|---|---|
| 65.7 % | 0.30 % | Community | |
| TikTok | 25.8 % | 0.02 % | Discovery |
| 7.5 % | 0.32 % | Conversion | |
| YouTube | 1.0 % | 0.34 % | Retention |
Four channels, one conversation.
Tell me about your project→ Sources: Meta Business Suite · TikTok Studio · YouTube Studio